Today’s Inside Higher Ed has an article by Barbara Fister called “The Library Vanishes – Again” that may be of interest.
Fister reports that EBSCO, which provides the Academic Search Premier database,” no longer offers full access to The Economist due to a contract dispute. Similarly, the ERIC database, an online database of education research and information, was taken offline because of undisclosed “privacy concerns.” It will remain offline until the privacy issues are resolved. Fister conjectures that the privacy issues ailing ERIC might well result from the searchability of digitized databases: now that ERIC’s 360,000+ documents are online, data within those documents, including confidential data, is simply easier to find. As she puts it,
materials that were publicly available in a pre-web state tended to evade notice; web access is wonderful, but it exposes things.
Fister’s article confirms the digital world’s double identity of promise and instability. Digitization makes items accessible and at its best provides full-text searchability. But until some core values are arrived at regarding how to guarantee digital life spans, a library’s promise of access, ever contingent on library budgets and whims, remains in question.
This fall may be a good time to give thought to the library as it is affected by digitization.
Early Modern Online Bibliography 
August 22, 2012 at 1:16 pm |
Can’t now remember where I saw this (it’s not original to me), but the way I like to think about it is that when you take something public and make it *more* public, you then need to consider the privacy implications of the more public status. In other words, there’s no hard line between private and public.
LikeLike
August 23, 2012 at 8:48 pm |
Yes. Apparently, searchability makes a database more public.
LikeLike
August 23, 2012 at 9:38 pm |
Thanks, Anna, for drawing attention to Fister’s piece, and Matt, for your comments.
I would like to know more about the privacy concerns that prompted ERIC to dismantle access temporarily. Fister’s example—the two or three college alumni who are not pleased when links surface from digitized old campus newspapers detailing their youthful exploits—is somewhat suggestive. Specifically, a Google search for someone may well turn up a snippet of copy in which that name appears. In any case, it is also telling that the microfiche may now no longer be available or easily accessible in one’s library—either discarded or stored offsite when the ERIC database took hold.
LikeLike
September 3, 2012 at 9:35 pm |
According to ERIC’s web site, the privacy concerns remain undisclosed, though they seem concerned with individuals’ privacy. They summarize the problem as follows:
September 4, 2012 at 12:37 am |
Thanks, Anna. After reading Fister’s piece, I had gone to the ERIC site and seen this statement. I did not find it that illuminating, but I also understand why ERIC might not want to describe the problem in full.
LikeLike